![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
mercula "optimal whey" serum vs Any Other Whey
I'd be very interested to know what folks know of the claims made by mercula on their whey "serum" vs whey isolate/hydro etc in terms of the treatment of the whey/protein.
(this also seems to be more of a meal replacement thing than straight protein, but i am interested in their protean claims) Quote:
but as to the serum part, Science thoughts? mc
__________________
* Getting Rid of Crap Around Goals * A few PN Forum Tool Tips & How To's mc, phd (human factors), cscs, rkc, ck-fms, ikff ckt, z health (r,i,s,t,9S:sustenance), interested in a movement assessment or kettlebell tune ups/training via skype? * begin2dig: getting to the middle of well being - b2d rss - twitter |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I will not claim to be a scientist but my skeptical marketing buttons have been hit. When I see the words, "but wait there's more" I start looking for used car salesmen.
I see proprietary system and that typically translates to EXPENSIVE. I see two studies mentioned, and a TON of asterisks on many of the claims being made. The asterisk leads to a disclaimer saying "these claims have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration." I don't like products with proprietary blends/processes where I can't see something specific. I'm also not fond of products making a ton of claims without providing cites in an easy to find manner. But none of those points are to the science specifically. So I apologize if I'm detouring the discussion.
__________________
Clara K. Showalter NASM-CPT Building better lives, one body at a time |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|